Friday, November 30, 2012

Life of Pi Review

No matter how many times Lucy promised Charlie Brown she wouldn't move the football, inevitably Charlie Brown ended up kicking air.  That's how I feel about watching movies in 3D: with the exception of Avatar, every time I think a 3D movie might be good, I am utterly disappointed.  Yet I keep doing it!  It invariably results in a bad experience and really takes AWAY from the movie rather than add to it.  In my defense, many critics (What the Flick!: I'm looking at you) said it was the best 3D since Avatar.  So, it is possible that my experience was tainted and I would have liked the movie more if I had watched it in 2D.  

SYNOPSIS
A floundering author finds an Indian (dot, not feather) man and persuades him to share his experience of when he was shipwrecked.  He then narrates an unbelievable tale of friendship, survival, and introspection.

REVIEW
First, let's go over the good.  The acting is spectacular.  All three different actors portraying Pi were fantastic.  It really is a beautifully shot film and will probably win best cinematography, in my opinion.  It doesn't deserve that award over Lincoln, but it will probably win.  And, the 3D was quite good, despite being a distraction at times. 

The music was fitting, in particular the Indian themes.  

Next, the bad.  I really should've listened to Michael Medved's warning that this film was all looks with no substance.  Although I think there was some substance, it was very difficult to get into.  It took a long time to get going and felt way too abstract.  

 SPOILER ALERT BELOW

In the end I thought it tried too hard to be just like the movie Atonement; the ending was so similar it was eerie.  The big difference is that Atonement was a more compelling and gripping story, which was made BETTER by the revelation at the end.  Whereas, I felt the out-of-this-world tale was cheapened by the revelation at the end of Life of Pi.  

CONCLUSION
Overall, I didn't like this movie, especially when compared to some of the other Oscar contenders like Argo and Lincoln.  I walked out of the theater confused and even angry at the ending.  2.25/5 stars.  

Review: ParaNorman

This still really is really descriptive of the characterizations
The big DVD/Blu-ray release this week is ParaNorman and I felt it important to review the movie here because 1) I think it's an important piece of cinema, and 2) I didn't get a chance to review it when I originally saw it.

Silas Lesnick over at ComingSoon.net, whom I follow on Twitter, posted late in the summer that he thought that ParaNorman was the most fun he'd had all year, which really piqued my interest in the film.  What I found was something I did not expect, but I'll leave that to the review portion below.

SYNOPSIS
Norman lives in a small witch-obsessed New England and finds himself to be very different from other people: he can see and talk with dead people.  Soon the town finds itself in a zombie crisis that only Norman is equipped to deal with.

REVIEW
This film was VERY different from what I thought it would be.  I thought it would be another Tim Burton-esque wannabe claymation film.  What it ended up doing was pushing Tim Burton to the back of the line of great claymation filmmakers.

The animation is very distinct and not as smooth as a Burton film, but I think that's a deliberate style choice.  The world they create is not as macabre as I thought it would be (i.e. it had a lot more color contrast).  The world they create is really fantastic.

They cover almost every base when it comes to stereotypical characters: the gooey-on-the-inside-bully, the over-dramatic-embarassed-of-her-little-brother teenage girl, the how-should-we-deal-with-our-strange-son parents, and the jock (who ends up surprising everyone at the end).  The voice acting is great and really matches the atmosphere they are set in.  The funniest thing to me was the extensive use of warm-ups in the wardrobes.

I didn't expect this film to have as much heart as it did.  I REALLY felt it at the climax.  Also it teaches an immensely important lesson to children, although I can't say that I recommend to small children because of the scary imagery.

The movie is SO funny.  And not just fart-joke funny, but really clever.

CONCLUSION
Whether you're a horror film fan or a student of cinema, this movie is a home run on almost all fronts.  The filmmakers really were able to package so many great elements into one animated movie.  The PG rating is too low, IMO.  4.68/5 Stars.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

The Blu-ray Experience: Superman The Movie

BLU-RAY EXPERIENCE?
At the request of a good friend, I've decided to review the Blu-ray Experience of certain films, in particular ones that I own.

When I say 'Blu-ray Experience,' I am referring to what my experience was in watching it in HD compared to Standard Definition DVD.  Also I will review the special features and what they add to a film.  Finally, I will give a 'Thumbs Up' or 'Thumbs Down' as to whether or not owning it is worth the price that it's going for on Amazon.

SHAMELESS PLUG
At the bottom of the page is a link if you wish to purchase the reviewed Blu-ray, and I actually end up getting a cut if you use that link to purchase it.

THE HD EXPERIENCE
Watching this film in High-Definition was really breathtaking.  Like I have and will continue to say about many films on Blu-ray: It was like watching a whole new movie.  There were many details that I noticed in the background or could read signs that I hadn't seen before.  It is a beautifully shot film and it really shines in HD, especially the Kansas scenes.  And, unlike many films in the 70's that I have watched in HD, it didn't ruin the movie or make it seem fake.  In the end, watching it with the higher quality made me appreciate the movie more, not less.

SPECIAL (OR NOT SO) FEATURES
The special features included in the Blu-ray are great, but they are the exact same as the two disc DVD release.  They include the original trailers, screen tests, a commentary track, and a documentary.  The commentary by Richard Donner (director) and Tom Mankiewicz (final script revisionist) is really worth listening to, IMO.  And the documentary about the making of the film is spectacular, detailing this chapter in cinematic history.

FINAL VERDICT
Thumbs Way Up.  I loved this and am very happy with the purchase.  You can get it in a 3-pack along with Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut and Superman Returns for about $17 on Amazon right now.  Very worth it, in my opinion. The product is linked here:
Superman / Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut / Superman Returns [Blu-ray]

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

#16 Return of the King


When I returned (no pun intended) from my two-year LDS mission in Canada I found that my dear friend Christopher was quite obsessed with The Lord of the Rings Trilogy.  And, wanting to spend time with him, I think he made me watch The Return of the King 4-5 times in a two month period, since it was the most recent of the Trilogy that had been released.  Then, I had several other friends who wanted me to watch it with them throughout that first summer. So, I initially had a bad taste in my mouth for this movie, having watched it so many times.  But, over time I grew to appreciate it more and more (especially after watching the extended edition on Blu-ray).

SYNOPSIS
If you haven't seen this movie or know what it's about, I feel sorry for you and recommend that you leave the rock that you've been living under for the past 15 years.  It's based on the the third and final novel in the genre-defining fantasy trilogy The Lord of the Rings.

REVIEW
What makes this movie great?  Almost everything.  The story is one for the ages, which is why it has lasted so long.  It is a true battle between freedom and tyranny, extinction or genocide, light vs dark. It highlights the perseverance of the human heart and how two small people can overcome unbearable odds.

The acting is spectacular with everyone giving the performances of their lives.  Sean Astin really did deserve the Best Supporting Actor nod he got.  I think Viggo Mortensen should have received Best Actor, ESPECIALLY in the extended edition.

I consider the cinematography and music in all of the trilogy to be the among the finest every filmed/recorded.  The cinematography is eye candy of a celestial nature.  And the music is everything a soundtrack should be: it evokes emotions, is quite memorable, and is very fitting of the scenes.

TRIVIA

  • WETA (The special effects shop that worked on all LOTR films) was quite intimidated by the rendering of Aragog, the giant spider in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. They felt when creating Shelob they should at least live up to that standard that HP set. 
  • Peter Jackson has very intense arachnophobia and based the designs of Shelob on the spiders he is most scared of.
  • All the beacons were CGI-created except one: that one was dropped by a helicopter and then lit. 
  • This film had an almost record breaking amount of CG shots at 1488.  A normal film has at most 200, the first film had 540, and the second one had 799.
  • The dead oliphant (giant elephant) is said to be the biggest prop ever built for a motion picture. 
  • Film reels are often shipped to theaters under false names in order to retain its secrecy. This one was shipped under the name 'Till Death For Glory'
CONCLUSION
I recommend that you watch this movie, but first watch the preceding two (which are higher in my top twenty).  And enjoy the 9 or so endings that it provides (my brother tells a funny story of a family in his same theater that got up after the first ending to walk out of the theater and ended up standing in the aisle for about 20ish minutes waiting for the movie to end, and end, and finally end). 4.85/5 Stars. 

Monday, November 26, 2012

Rise of the Guardians rises above its competition

When I first saw the trailers for this film, I was filled with both skepticism and excitement.  The trailer seemed to promise to combine several of my favorite film themes: epic fantasy, folklore, and humor.  This could be very good...or a disaster.  Dreamworks Animation doesn't have a great track record this year (or in past years for that matter).  I knew I would eventually see it, but wasn't really excited to see it until the folks over at collider.com liked it and made particular mention that there weren't any fart jokes in it.

SYNOPSIS
The children's legends Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the Sandman, and the Tooth Fairy are the Guardians: protectors of children's happiness.  A new threat has presented itself in which the fun-loving Jack Frost is chosen to join the Guardians to help protect the children of the world.

REVIEW
This movie was the best thing to come out of Dreamworks animation since How To Train Your Dragon.  The story is epic as I hoped it would be.  It's very funny and is even touching at points.  It's the closest that Dreamworks has come to the Pixar formula.  But, it's not quite Pixar quality.

The voice acting was better than How To Train Your Dragon, IMO.  Chris Pine as Jack Frost really showed subtlety and made you feel his conflict.  Hugh Jackman using his native Australian accent was brilliant.  Alec Baldwin's Russian Santa Claus was over hyped and didn't really do much for me.

The music was forgettable.  Although the climax was well scored.

CONCLUSION
It was a very enjoyable film.  It's quite a shame that it's not doing better at the box office (I think it came in 4th this long weekend).  3.5/5 Stars.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

#17 The Dark Knight

I've probably read hundreds, if not thousands, of  individual issues of Batman comics and I have never seen the Joker portrayed as scarily as Heath Ledger portrays him in 2008's Christopher Nolan masterpiece The Dark Knight.  His Hannibal Lecter-esqe performance is one for the history books and earned him his well deserved Academy award.

SYNOPSIS
Gotham city's criminals are scared that their livelihood will diminish as the masked vigilante Batman cleans up the streets. In desperation they turn to a psychopath who dresses as a clown to handle the Batman problem.  What ensues is an epic battle between chaos and order.

REVIEW
To say that this is the best comic book movie ever made is an understatement.  It is so scary that I can barely sit through some of the scenes.  It really makes the audience think about whether humans are by nature good, bad or neutral.  This is a substance-filled film in every sense.  

The acting is superb by everyone, with Heath Ledger standing out.  Bale gives a great performance as a conflicted Batman.  Aaron Eckhart and Gary Oldham also gave Oscar-worthy performances.  

The music is perfect.  It really brings out the conflicts and will make you weep at times.

TRIVIA
  • Based on several Batman comic story lines including The Long Halloween, The Killing Joke, and Dark Victory. 
  • Heath Ledger basically locked himself in a hotel room for a month with only a few Joker-focused Batman comics in order to prepare for the role.  He would keep a journal  that was what his interpretation of the Joker would think about his day to day activities.
  • Is currently 5th on the all-time domestic box office with a whopping $522 million dollars in North America alone.
  • It is the first time that IMAX cameras were used in a feature film (i.e. non-documentary, etc.)
CONCLUSION
This is an amazing movie.  I can't recommend it enough.  5/5 stars. 

Friday, November 23, 2012

Black Friday Plunder

I thought I would post my black friday deals I got. All this for less than $35.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The Case of the Missing LOST Envy (or the lack thereof)

Although I thought that the final season of Lost was a huge disappointment and that they jumped the shark earlier in the series, I still consider Lost to be one of the definitive examples of quality television.  Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse ran a very tight show, despite not being able to end it well (which isn't a surprise because there are almost no shows that end on a high note).  So, I shouldn't be surprised by the amount of television shows that have what I have coined as 'Lost Envy.'

I define 'Lost Envy' as any show that tries to create a sci-fi mystery with two or more components of Lost.  I think the first show that blatantly exhibited this was Flash Forward.  They had a huge mystery that was gradually being uncovered and also alternated between two different time periods.  It died a horrible death and now lies at the bottom of the heap of shows that died of Lost Envy.  The next entry was probably The Event, but I'm not sure.

The current season of Lost Envious shows that have cropped up include Last Resort and in particular Revolution.  Last Resort was cancelled, in part at least, because I think people saw through its Lost Envy right away.  But, Revolution was a different story.

If you know me at all, you probably know how awful I think Revolution is.  This is not blind hatred: I have suffered through almost 5 whole episodes!  The acting is atrocious.  The plot is mildly interesting, but is going nowhere fast.  It really needs to die.  I sincerely don't see the appeal of it.

So, my point is that Lost cannot be replicated, no matter how hard you try.  The closest thing to it is Once Upon A Time: a character-driven, emotionally deep ensemble show with a great story to boot.  So, writers of the television world: PLEASE STOP TRYING!  That formula is so delicate and you need some really great show runners to pull it off, which have all gone over to USA methinks.

#18 Rocky (1976)

It seems that certain movies put certain cities on the map, and I really think that this movie put Philadelphia on the map for me.  If I ever visit I will certainly visit the stairs featured in Rocky.  I also believe that this was the first real sports movie hit (granted, I wasn't born yet when it was released). Disney owes a great deal to this movie. (I'm looking at you Remember the Titans).

SYNOPSIS
A young boxer tries to make ends meet by being a loan shark debt collector whilst trying to court the girl of his dreams.  Eventually he is given a chance of a lifetime to fight the heavyweight champion of the world as a publicity stunt by said champion.  The boundaries of the human drive are then tested in the fight of a lifetime.

REVIEW
The acting is so subtle and easily Stallone's best performance ever.  Everyone else in the movie, and I mean EVERYONE, gives an Oscar-worthy performance.

The writing is especially good when you realize it was Stallone himself who wrote it.

The cinematography is especially beautiful, and I would say is the best of its decade.  The lighting, the angles, everything is just gorgeous.

The music is fun too, but isn't epic.  It's very low budget, which is fine for the film.

TRIVIA

  • The film is an allegory of Stallone's career as an actor.  In particular he shows how hard it is for Rocky to make it as a boxer representing how hard it was for him to make it as an actor.
  • He refused to sell the script unless he starred in it as well.
  • Stallone quit smoking in order to make this film, because he kept running out of breath. 
  • Each of the 4 rounds witnessed in the film were shot IN THEIR ENTIRETY twice: once with the steady cam operator in the audience and once with him in the ring. 
  • Rocky is a Southpaw, which makes him the coolest boxer ever. 
CONCLUSION
One of the best sports movies ever.  The best boxing movie ever.  The best Stallone movie ever.  Great film. I can't recommend it enough.  5/5 stars. 

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Lincoln Review

I was quite excited for this film.  History + Spielberg + great reviews = recipe for success. Right?  Well it's quite a mixed bag in many ways.

SYNOPSIS
The basis of this film is a book called "Team of Rivals" that details the political machinations of Lincoln and his cabinet.  The period of the book/history that the movie is taken from is the one month in which Lincoln tries to get the House of Representatives to pass the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, or in other words to abolish slavery.  What ensues is a treatise on the sausage making known as American Politics.

REVIEW
The first half of the film showcases how brilliant of an actor Daniel Day-Lewis is.  But that's about it.  The first half is so discombobulated and straight up boring that I considered leaving the theater.  My blog-writing self eventually prevailed and I am very happy that it did.

The second half is amazing with the most powerful payoffs, which is what we all expect from Spielberg and why we all consider him the master of movie making.  I openly wept more than once and am getting emotional just thinking about it.

The acting was amazing with Day-Lewis easily winning his third best actor award.  There were so many big names in this that I couldn't even keep attempt to keep a mental list of them.  My unexpected favorite was Gloria Reuben as Mrs. Lincoln's handmade.  She added so much with so little.

The soundtrack is superb and probably Williams' best since Harry Potter.  So moving and fitting to the times.

The cinematography really is something to write home about.  It was masterfully shot knocking the much heralded Skyfall out of the....well...sky.

CONCLUSION
I recommend this movie, but go into it remembering that the first hour or so is a chore to get through.  In the end I really liked this movie, even though it took time to get there.

This film is pretty safe for children, but could be considered by some to be cruel and unusual punishment to bring them along.  

I really don't think this will or should win Best Picture.  It is not a perfect film by any standard. 3.75/5 stars.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

#19 Ghostbusters 1984

It seems that everyone has a different favorite quote from Ghostbusters, and there is a plethora to choose from! My personal favorite is:

"Of course, you forget, Peter, I was present at an undersea, unexplained mass sponge migration."

At the age of 5 when I first saw this movie I had no idea it was a spoof on the paranormal film genre explosion of the late 70's and early 80's, but apparently that's exactly what it was.  I just thought it was awesome that 4 guys carried around backpacks that could wrangle ghosts!  To this day I want a proton pack!

SYNOPSIS
In New York City, 3 research professors of paranormal studies are fired and are forced to open a ghost catching business in order to make ends meet.

REVIEW
I still consider this to be one of the funnier movies of all time.  The guys are just great together, with my favorite being Rick Moranis as Vince Clothor. The chemistry between Sigourney Weaver and Bill Murray is priceless.  It also ends up being fairly scary at parts too, especially to a 5 year old.  This is an ensemble movie at its best.

The music is fantastic!  Elmer Bernstein's score is great and of course the theme song is wonderful too.

TRIVIA

  • Eddie Murphy was originally slated to play Winston, but was doing Beverly Hills Cop at the time. 
  • As a result of Eddie Murphy not being in the movie, the script was rewritten to introduce the Winston character later in the film instead of having him as an original part of the team.
  • John Candy was originally supposed to play a lawyer/accountant character that helped out as the team's lawyer and then was turned into the dog.  Obviously Rick Moranis' character is what they ended up with, for which I am eternally grateful.
  • Although not explicitly an SNL movie, its writers and actors all have very strong ties to the late night sketch show. 
  • The Stay-Puft Marshmallow suits cost $20 Grand to make. 
  • Until the release of Home Alone, Ghostbusters was the highest grossing comedy of all-time. 
CONCLUSION
The film has aged very well.  I adore and can still watch it anytime I want a chuckle.  I give it a 10/10 or 5/5.  

PS. Please share your favorite quote from the film below. 



BREAKING: I will not be reviewing Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part II

My normal evening de-stressing process normally involves either an episode of Parks and Recreation or Modern Family.  Much to my delight I coincidentally stumbled upon this episode of Parks and Rec two weeks ago that shows the craziness of some Twilight fans:



It's not that I am not proud of what Stephanie Meyer has accomplished, it's that I just despise everything about the books/movies. To be fair, I did watch the first three films at the urging of my dear mother.  The first one wasn't that bad, and the second one was okay.  But the third one was painful to watch.  As said in Billy Madison: "We are now dumber for listening to that answer."

I won't get into whether Twilight is good for society (mostly because I don't want to offend my sweet mother or loving sisters), but I will say that I do not see the appeal and am very glad this phenomenon is coming to an end.  In the (supposed) words of Stephen King:

"Harry Potter is about confronting fears, finding inner strength and doing what is right in the face of adversity. Twilight is about how important it is to have a boyfriend."
So, I will be reviewing Lincoln this weekend, not Twilight.  Definitely count me in team NOT-Twilight. 

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

#20: Superman The Movie (1978)

I'm not sure how many little boys didn't want to be Superman growing up, but I can't imagine there are more than a few.  Like many little boys, after seeing this movie I ran around both mine and others' houses with a towel on my back for weeks.  This movie had a defining impact on my life by introducing to the world of dreams where right is might, virtue is commendable, and of course SUPERHEROES!

SYNOPSIS
This is the story of a child of a scientist who is trying to save a dying alien civilization.  In an attempt to save his only Son, he sends him away to earth with all his knowledge and love.  That Son is found in Smallville, Kansas by two loving parents who teach him right from wrong and to master his superhuman abilities caused by his exposure to the earth's yellow sun.  Eventually this child becomes Superman: the first superhero.

REVIEW
This story is fantastic and rings true to the human heart.  It is split into three different acts that could easily be movies of their own.  The first act is a Shakespearean space opera, the second is Americana hometown life, and the third is a comic book.  It really is masterfully put together, although I wish they had kept the original ending that Richard Donner, the director, had intended for it.

Christopher Reeve is a wonderful Superman (most don't know that he is an accomplished pianist and studied acting at Juliard). Marlon Brando and Glenn Ford were also brilliantly cast.  Whereas Margo Kidder was miscast, IMO.  I know they were really trying to get chemistry, which they did, but I still think they could have found someone better.  Lois has proven to be the hardest part to cast for in any Superman production.  I think the TV series Smallville cast the best Lois in Erica Durance.  Also I feel that Gene Hackman was miscast, or at least mis-characterized.  He was a funny bad guy, but neither a mad scientist or a brilliant billionaire.  They really missed an opportunity with that one.

The music is absolutely brilliant.  It REALLY captures the heart of Superman and to this day I think is some of John Williams' best work.

USELESS TRIVIA

  • The Smallville scenes were filmed in Calgary, Alberta
  • Both this and its sequel were filmed at the same time
  • The ending of the first movie was originally supposed to be the ending of the second movie
  • Marlon Brando got paid more for 2 weeks of shooting than the rest of the cast got combined
  • The part of Superman was originally offered to several big name actors including Clint Eastwood, Robert Redford, and others.
  • Is considered to be the 3rd real 'Blockbuster' after Jaws and Star Wars. 
  • Steven Spielberg showed interest in directing the movie before Jaws was released, but then was asking for too much money after such a big success. 
  • The original teaser trailer showed nothing but the camera going through clouds like the audience was flying. 
CONCLUSION
If you haven't seen this movie, I highly recommend it. The ending is bit much, but the rest of the movie is such a joy that I overlook it every time. 5/5 stars. *****


Top 20 List

Hey All,

I've decided that I will give reviews of my top 20 movies of all time in between the regular new releases that I see (which I will be reviewing Lincoln this weekend). I will also be providing useless trivia associated with each of these films.  Cheers!

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Skyfall is no Chicken Little

Does Skyfall live up to its hype? Is Daniel Craig the best James Bond ever? How does Javier Bardem's 'Silva' stack up against 50 years of competition? Does the sky really fall in Skyfall?  These were my questions going into the theater yesterday, and I will now answer them.

SYNOPSIS
If you've seen any trailer for Skyfall, you know that Bond is shot as the climax of the first action sequence. Then Bond reappears to help MI6 in their most dire moments. He is badly damaged emotionally and physically but perseveres as one expects Bond to do. The twist is a villain that scares everyone, including Bond and the audience.

REVIEW
The acting was quite brilliant with Javier Bardem stealing the show (no surprise) and is hands down the BEST Bond villain ever. Bardem needs to play the Joker in a Batman movie someday. I liked Craig in Casino Royale more, but he still stands as the best Bond in my opinion. Judi Dench's M was as good as ever. And both Ralph Feines and the kid playing Q were great as well.

There was a lot of hype associated with the cinematography.  And I'm sorry to say that while it was good, it wasn't brilliant. It was the best shot Bond film ever, but not Oscar-worthy, IMO.

The normal musical opening montage was really good.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

The story was good, but didn't feel like a Bond story for some reason.  I can't pinpoint what it was, but it just didn't feel Bondish.

The reason for the title of the film isn't revealed until later in the story, and I was a bit taken aback by it.  I won't spoil it here!

CONCLUSION
Skyfall was a great film. My expectations were really high because of the hype.  The folks that said that it was better than Casino Royale are smoking somethin'.  But it was a great spy flick nonetheless and a welcome addition to the Bond collection. 4/5 stars.

Friday, November 9, 2012

Wreck-It Ralph demolishes the competition

What do you get when you combine Scott Pilgrim and Disney?  You get a clever, emotional roller coaster of a movie, which is what Wreck-It Ralph is.  A Pixar quality film that races circles around every animated movie since Toy Story 3.

SYNOPSIS
The film is about a video game character Wreck-It Ralph whose entire purpose is to be a 'bad guy' in a Donkey Kong-esqu game called Fix It Felix Jr.  His life consists of breaking a building that Felix cleans up and then being thrown off the top of said building when he loses. Understandably, he gets sick of that and not getting any recognition for his contributions.  So, he decides to go on a quest for a medal and starts game jumping to find it.

REVIEW
The Story is wonderful! If you're not laughing you are either crying or in awe at this world that Disney has created here.  It was is one of the most clever concepts for an animated movie.

The voice acting was amazing with Sarah Silverman really stealing the show.  But the rest were fantastic as well with Jane Lynch really providing a convincing dominant general type role.

The animation was good, but not quite Pixar quality; it didn't stun me like Toy Story 3 or even Tangled did.

WHO WILL ENJOY THIS MOVIE
I took my 56-year-old father in law to see this movie, and he loved it almost as much as I did.  So, you don't need to be 'gamer' to appreciate this film, but there certainly were places where other games and I were laughing and others like my father-in-law weren't.

It is NOT appropriate for small children. There were scary scenes and a very strange scene where a character rips the heart out of a zombie (not sure how they got a PG rating with that in there).

CONCLUSION
I give it 5/5 stars. An absolutely brilliant.  My pick for best of the year so far.  Not sure how much Oscar attention it will get mostly because the academy doesn't 'get' movies that have to do with video games or any amount of science-fiction.  It's just their way.

P.S. 
Stay after the credits. Also, the opening short was brilliant.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Welcome to my blog!

Coming to you from Sonora desert, this is Disco Dan's Movie Blog!  Here I will provide family friendly movie reviews. But I will also review TV shows and comment on the relevant pop culture in the news (i.e. I will not be talking about any Kardashians). And I promise NO POLITICS! I do have certain values which will come through in what movies I like, but no overt political commentary.